Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. The Braveheart speech, while famous for being powerful, is very different from another powerful speech, the one from Dead Poets Society. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. He notes how essential it is to break silence before all hope is lost. In the article "Beyond Vietnam", Martin Luther argues that war in Vietnam has far reaching affects that not only rapaciously take away America's resources, but make an immediate impact on African Americans perspective on the civil rights movement. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. This demonstrates to the audience that he realizes it is going to be difficult for them to speak out in opposition of the government. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. Additionally, Kings statement that Southeast Asia is eight thousand miles away strengthens the irony by making Southeast Asia seem like a place which is completely disconnected from America. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. Supplemental understanding of the topic including revealing main issues described in the particular theme; He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message. Martin Luther King notes that we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools (King). Many great speeches are increasingly different. By continuing well assume you board with our, Rhetorical Analysis on Kennedy Steel Speech, Rhetorical Analysis of The Mexican-American and the Chruch Speech, Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther Kings I Have a Dream Speech, Rhetorical Devices in Bill Clintons Speech at the Democratic Convention, Speech Analysis: Speech in the Virginia Convention, How to secure financing as a small business owner, How to Make a Business Plan for Any Business, 7 Crucial Macro Environment Factors to Include in Your Analysis, Macro Environment Examples in the Real World. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. The speaker comments, that they wander into the hospitals with at least twenty casualties from American firepower for one Vietcong-inflicted injury. PDF Beyond Vietnam, speech by Dr. Martin Luther King, NYC, 4/4/67 To achieve this, he used rhetorical strategies such as appeal to pathos and repetition. King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. The war was only going to consume lives and resources. 1) Controversial Opinions of MLK 2) Religious figure talking about political problems 3) Malcolm X and his ideas Fitting Response EXIGENCY First Persona-Martin Luther King Second Persona-American Population and the Civil Rights Movement Third Persona- Vietnamese Population Acasestudy.com 2007-2019 All rights reserved. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). He then outlines the history of the war in Vietnam, showing that he is not simply preaching about religious ideals. Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism requirements? Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. On August 28th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr gave us one of one of the most rhetorically moving speeches ever given. Dont King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. If he had not shown knowledge of the background of the war, it would be easy to dismiss his other pleas as lofty religious ideals. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war(8). Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis . Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. For example, in paragraph 7, King discusses the harsh reality of the war. In "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence," Martin Luther King, a civil rights leader, uses his voice to bring attention to the injustices of race. King Jr makes a strong statement against war and his speech successfully evokes compassion and sympathy for the poor and the weak in both Vietnam and America. * Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document, American Women Struggle in the 20th Century, Charlottesville Tragedy: Racial Issue in the USA, Prison Staffing and Correctional Officers Duties, Gender Issues in the Us Correctional System. For instance, he does when he depicts the, Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. Furthermore his speech did not. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. Registered address: Louki Akrita, 23 Bellapais Court, Flat/Office 46 1100, Nicosia, Cyprus Lastly, Martin Luther King uses logos in his famous speech. 1. War makes the innocent lose hope and leaves behind horrific memories for generations on both sides. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin | Cram Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. However, the persuasiveness of his speeches does not come solely from his ability to connect with his audience's emotions but from an extraordinary ability to reason and validate his point. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes Americas involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. During the final years of . Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam Analysis - 341 Words | Bartleby 804-506-0782 Kings main motive was to persuade people to see how war was destroying lives, society and economy and being silent meant being in approval of the war. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, Beyond Vietnam A Time to Break Silence. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break | Bartleby (2022) 'The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis'. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. It permits Dr. King to enlighten people of what was going in that time period. Titled as the I Have a Dream Speech, he read this speech to the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. So, what America is doing to other nations like Vietnam also matters. All they wanted was to save the soul of America (King, Beyond, 42). Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond | Bartleby He tries to make people see the other side of the picture where both black and white men were being pushed into hell without considering and questioning the outcome. Vietnam War Rhetorical Analysis - 896 Words | Bartleby With an urgent tone, he repeats the phrase, we must speak (4), several times. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. It is not typical for churches to do so. Is Hydrogen Fuel Efficient Enough to Replace Fossil Fuels in the Near Future. 663 Words; "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." He calls the situation some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready Dr. King paints a vivid, heart-wrenching picture of the devastation in Vietnam. All rights reserved. https://nolongerinvisiblemen.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/sparknotes-for-martin-luther-king-jr-s-a-time-to-break-silence/, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm, Microsoft Corporation SWOT Analysis (2016), Zora Neale Hurstons Their Eyes were watching God: Analysis. He then goes on to reveal some of his more personal feelings. He evaluates the psychological as well as social, political and economic implications of America's participation in Vietnam war. This comparison is very sobering. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. The most famous speeches in the United States history all have utilized rhetoric devices and strategies. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his opinion on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. America is overlooking its own poor and pouring resources into a war which does not offer any political, economic or social advantage. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam Martin Luther King Jr. builds an argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Martin Luther King was a determined activist for equality for all. He notes, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. Right at the outset, King involves religious figures to establish the credibility for his reason and to prove that war was improper and inhuman. Artifact One: Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis By repeating the phrase, for the sake, he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. To get his point through and make the meaning clear, King uses phrases like break the silence of the night, a vocation of agony, based upon the mandates of conscience, deeper level of awareness. Ethos, the appeal to the legitimacy and authority of the speaker, is used throughout the speech. War is expensive. This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. He proves that the government has been manipulating the poor when he writes, It was sending. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . He is using vivid language to describe the casualties; however, they are also supported by evidence, as he is using precise numbers in this part of the speech. In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam - 751 Words | Cram King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. This special lyrical and parallel structure helped get his main points across and allows a large audience to understand simple but powerful words (Layfield) . Kings letter is a response to those in the church who have critizied him, Yet, instead of apologizing, he stands strong for his cause and turns it around on them stating his own critisim. [emailprotected] (2022, May 4). Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. BEYOND VIETNAM- " Martin Luther King" by Anne Marie Paintsil - Prezi He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam: a Time to Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). Showing his knowledge of the history of the war and using it to discredit the United States reason for being there is crucial to Dr. King in developing his position. King wants his audience. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." Through his compelling arguments and moral vision, King inspired many people to join the movement against the Vietnam War and to work for a more just and peaceful world. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. Therefore, to remain silent would truly be betrayal. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Additionally, by constructing an optimistic view on the civil rights situation during that time period and immediately refuting it, King is able to establish a strong sense of, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesn't address their oppressor, the U.S. government. "beyond Vietnam-A Time To Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis No one should be restricted from rights and opportunities that others are given for that long. Through this speech, and his ideals of determination, many rhetorical devices are put to use to drive forth these points. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King delivered his first major public statement against the Vietnam War, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence." Addressing a crowd of 3,000 at Riverside Church in New York City, King condemned the war as anti-democratic, impractical, and unjust. His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. Dr. King plainly states his purpose near the beginning of his speech. Perhaps the most convincing part of the speech is the emotional appeal. This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. He states, Many people have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. Would you like to get a custom case study? Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Kings dialect showed the audience civil right issues, involving many rhetorical strategies using ethos, logos, and pathos, to a racially tempered crowd whom he viewed as different, but not equal. 2022. Then the segregation of African Americans and White Americans started. Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay.docx - Course Hero Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. In a solemn tone, he talks about their crops being destroyed and their water being poisoned, presumably referring to Agent Orange. This is an obvious and extremely effective argument, especially among a group of Christian church leaders. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. At the heart of their concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about the war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent?(King). Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audiences pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. In Martin Luther King Jr.s speech Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay.docx - Thomas 1 Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Hence, Kings works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. "The Fine Art of Baloney Detection" Essay by Carl Sagan. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children (King). He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence SHEC: Resources for Teachers You may use it as a guide or sample for His speech grows deeply sarcastic at times. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. He believed that the Vietnam War diverted money and attention from domestic programs created to aid the black poor and would benefit only the banks who fund wars and the industries that supply the war. Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence.